Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jan 30, 2016 in Medical Malpractice, Uncategorized |

Untangle the Legal Web of Medical Malpractice

Untangle the Legal Web of Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice is a legal offense that happens when a medical practitioner fails to perform medicals duties due to negligence, ultimately causing harm to the patient. New York medical malpractice attorneys encounter hundreds of these cases each year with patients who are left with long-lasting damages as a result of substandard healthcare. Over 90 percent of cases eventually reach settlements out of court and you might be eligible to collect one of these settlements if you have been injured at the hands of your healthcare provider.

Common Reasons for Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

Failure to Diagnose – If a doctor fails to diagnose a disease or made a wrong diagnosis that resulted in further injury, the patient will have a viable claim for medical malpractice.Medical Records & Stethoscope

Improper Treatment – If doctor administers wrong treatment or administers the right treatment wrongly then the patient has a right to file a medical malpractice claim.

Failure to Alert Patients in Advance to Known Risks – Medical practitioners are required to fully disclose any risks that might occur during a medical procedure. If the patient is aware and refuses to go through the procedure, the doctor will have a case if any injuries occur during the procedure. However, if the doctor fails to provide clear information on the potential risks, he would be at fault and could face a lawsuit.

Legal Requirements for Medical Malpractice Claims

Different states have different rules and procedures on medical malpractice claims. However, as a general rule, these iStock_000010454752XSmallare the guidelines that all New York medical malpractice attorneys must follow in order to pursue a settlement.

Expert Testimony – A qualified medical expert is almost always required to testify both before and during the trial. The rules to follow when choosing someone to give expert opinion vary from state to state so ask your medical malpractice attorney to guide you in choosing the right one.

Limits on Damage Awards – Each state has their own limit on damage awards that can be legally given to a medical malpractice patient.

Notice Requirements – In all states, the patient is required to give notice to the doctor before filling for any medical malpractice claim.

Special Review Panel – Patient is required to present claim of malpractice to a panel to review. The panel will hear the arguments, expert opinion and review evidence and then they will decide whether there was any malpractice. The patient must go through the panel before going to court.

Statute of Limitations – The case must be brought to court soon within two years of the medical malpractice. This can vary slightly depending on the state. If one does not file the claim within the period the case will be dismissed.

Burden of Proof

The New York medical malpractice attorney must be able to show evidence to support the claims. There are three things that the attorney will need to prove in order for the claim to be considered in court.

#1 – The Injury Led to Specific Damages

The patient must produce proof that the injury led to certain damages. Even in situations where there is no injury in the body, the patient can sue the doctor for physical pain, mental anguish, or resulting stress from extra medical bills if the doctor did not follow the right procedure.

1#2 – The Doctor’s Actions Were Directly Responsible for Injuries

The patient should be able to prove that the doctor’s negligence is the cause of injury. This could be the most difficult part of winning a medical malpractice case. For instance, if a cancer patient dies as a result of negligence from the oncologist, it will be hard to prove that the death was directly tied to the doctor’s failure rather than to the cancer itself.

#3 – The Dates and Interactions of the Doctor-Patient Relationship

The patient must be able to show evidence that the doctor in question was directly involved with medical care and the procedures in question.